The Washington PostThe Washington Post

You hate AI for all the right reasons. Now reconsider

By Josh Tyrangiel

11 Sep 2023 · 6 min read

informed Summary

  1. It’s possible we’re at the dawn of an incredible era of toolmaking, with the emergence of ChatGPT marking a quantum leap into an awesome future, Josh Tyrangiel writes in the Washington Post.

Let's start with the end. If you know anything about the state of artificial intelligence, it's that many of the people advancing the technology are gravely concerned about the technology they're advancing. Two statements stand out. The first was a petition, following the March release of OpenAI's ChatGPT-4, calling for a six-month pause on any AI system exceeding GPT's capabilities. The signatories - a loose association of AI geniuses (Turing Award-winner Yoshua Bengio), tech barons (Elon Musk) and moths to a flame (Andrew Yang) - asked: "Should we develop nonhuman minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us? Should we risk loss of control of our civilization?"

The second statement, issued in May, was an escalation of both stakes and prestige - a Met Gala of doom. Signed by nearly all the major AI company CEOs and most of the top AI research scientists, this statement was just 22 words long. Which really helped the 'E' word pop: "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war."

Sign in to informed

  • Curated articles from premium publishers, ad-free
  • Concise Daily Briefs with quick-read summaries
  • Read, listen, save for later, or enjoy offline
  • Enjoy personalized content